November 22, 1963
Dallas, Texas
In less than
a second,
America died. |
CONTENTS |
"If you shut up the truth and bury it under the ground, it will but grow, and gather to itself such explosive power that the day it bursts through it will blow up everything in its way."
- French author Emile Zola
|
"Treason does never prosper.
What's the reason?
When it prospers,
None dare call it treason."
Sir John Harrington
|
|
The Three Tramps
And there was a pack with a lot of newspaper articles.
They als found this gun. It's the kind that usually are issued to federal workers, but of course other people can have them. But they found this gun and it had been wiped clean, there were no fingerprints. And it was indeed the weapon that was used to kill Edwina. And then he had taken a hammer, it was believed that he killed his father with a hammer. What happened is that she went to his door and ... because he murdered her outside of his door, and dragged her down the stairs. He mopped up the stairs a little bit, not a very good job of mopping. And he took her to the bath tub and bled her out and disected her there.
This is the saw he used. There is lots of flesh and blood in that saw. It is very obviously the weapon used, or the tool, the utensil to take them apart, his parents.
(Graphic picture not suitable for use)
And then there is this ...
And here is a picture of Charles Rogers. From the Navy, he was in the Navy. But he was also in the Navy intelligence corps. I don't know exactly what they call it, but all of the armed forces, everyone knows that after World War II all of the armed forces, their intelligence people were merged together to form the CIA. And we are in possession of a document that says he was in Navy Intelligence.
Here is his highschool picture where he is smiling.
And there is the shorter tramp. Charles Rogers was five foot five, a 145 pounds, and he was 41 years old that day. every single feature is consistent. The only thing is the the person on the right has aged, from that highschool picture.
Editor's note: Unfortunately, there is hardly any photo known of Charles Rogers contemporary with the 1963 time frame. Only photo's of a much younger Charles Rogers are available. The look of people's appearances may alter with age. Although the shorter tramp may look somewhat different to the untrained eye, every facial structure and dimension is consistent.
And on the left you notice the man with the tie. Those sixties' thin ties. He has got his head down. Notice the bones shape in his forehead ...
The hairline. Everything. To me this definitely could be Charles Rogers.
Here is another picture. Do you notice that even though the blond tramp is behind him, he still comes off looking a little taller? He should appear way shorter because in the distance things get smaller. So he is obviously shorter than Charles Harrelson.
|
|
click